Computer ethics and law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Com regulateer ethics and law - Essay ExampleTo regurgitate the discussion into perspective, well use a occurrence study involving a ready reckoner professional and a customer requiring a personnel management database system. The client chooses the least secure security system from among the list of systems provided. The computer professional clearly clarifies to the customer the security loopholes associated with the system, notable, the risk of unauthorised access to the sensitive personnel information, which power lead to compromise of personnel information by hackers, but the client insists on using it. As Bittner & Hornecker (2002, p. 1) notes, the daily routine of computer professionals provides them with unique opportunities to do the right thing as well as numerous obstacles to achieving this. However, as Norman (1988, p. 2) puts it, the ...design of technological artefacts should minimise risk and consequences of delusion. All professional be compel to act in such a wa y as to be worthy of the clients trust (Bayles 1989) and to visualize social responsibility in all their duties (Durbin 1992). Martin (2011) adds to this by using the words pride, honor and self-respect to constitute the ideal conduct of computer professionals. In deciding the way to go, the computer professional in this case study should consider the respectable and professional provisions of the IEEE-CS/ACM Software Engineering Code of Ethics and pro Practice as it is generally accepted as a standard documentation of software package engineers ethical and professional requirements and responsibilities. The code has eight principles which Gotterbarn (2000) says are not to be considered as completely exhaustive since in that location is no way of telling what moral concerns may emerge in the future. They should instead act as a broad framework for professional ethics. Gotterbarn, Miller & Rogerson (1997) reiterate this saying that he IEEE-CS/ACM SECEPP is not mean to be all i nclusive, nor is it intended that its individual parts be used in isolation to exempt errors of omission or commission. At the general scale, the IEEE-CS/ACM SECEPP stresses on the engineering professions tariff to the public whose health, welfare and safety should take precedence and indeed form the basis of the eight principles of the SECEPP. The worldly concern principle is of particular relevance to our case study. Gotterbarn (1999) argues that computer professionals have substantial chances to do good or cause harm and to aid and influence others to do the same. The principle of Public however requires software engineers to put the public interest first. Not only does this principle hold software engineers responsible for their decisions. In that context, they are required to balance the needs of all the parties (employer, customer, and themselves) with the welfare and safety of the public. This empowers the software engineers to disapprove any software or component of an IT system that might threaten privacy, degrade the environment, compromise the quality of human tone and is especially critical in the manufacture of safety-critical software computer software whose failure or error can cause directly